<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ANGLICAN CHURCH WON&#8217;T FIGHT CIVIL UNIONS	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mambaonline.com/2006/09/15/anglican-church-wont-fight-civil-unions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2006/09/15/anglican-church-wont-fight-civil-unions/</link>
	<description>South Africa&#039;s leading LGBTQ news and community platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: boy_elf		</title>
		<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2006/09/15/anglican-church-wont-fight-civil-unions/#comment-5077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boy_elf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mambaonline.com/2006/09/15/anglican-church-wont-fight-civil-unions/#comment-5077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Marriage Bill. I for one agree with a civil union bill. Why change thousands of years of tradition just because you want a different synonym for the bill? Marriage will always be between a man and a woman...it&#039;s been like that for years and years. Civil unions are ideal and in no way do they marginalise gay people. It seems that a lot of gay people like to raise a stink about silly matters... we are equal. The constitution ensures that and this is even more pronounced with the civil union bill. You can&#039;t have your cake and eat it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Marriage Bill. I for one agree with a civil union bill. Why change thousands of years of tradition just because you want a different synonym for the bill? Marriage will always be between a man and a woman&#8230;it&#8217;s been like that for years and years. Civil unions are ideal and in no way do they marginalise gay people. It seems that a lot of gay people like to raise a stink about silly matters&#8230; we are equal. The constitution ensures that and this is even more pronounced with the civil union bill. You can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
