<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MultiChoice doesn’t give a damn about censoring LGBT shows	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mambaonline.com/2016/06/01/multichoice-doesnt-give-damn-censoring-lgbt-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2016/06/01/multichoice-doesnt-give-damn-censoring-lgbt-shows/</link>
	<description>South Africa&#039;s leading LGBTQ news and community platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Grant		</title>
		<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2016/06/01/multichoice-doesnt-give-damn-censoring-lgbt-shows/#comment-998223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mambaonline.com/?p=64452#comment-998223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To be honest, I am Cait was a horrible show... But I guess it took public opinion a lot further towards normalising gender-non-conformity, which is a good thing.

That it was blocked on the basis of what she was is not right, but that it was blocked on that basis is not clear... Can we please get clarity, in the form of a statement from the Broadcaster?

Let us know please!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>To be honest, I am Cait was a horrible show&#8230; But I guess it took public opinion a lot further towards normalising gender-non-conformity, which is a good thing.</p>
<p>That it was blocked on the basis of what she was is not right, but that it was blocked on that basis is not clear&#8230; Can we please get clarity, in the form of a statement from the Broadcaster?</p>
<p>Let us know please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Caulfield Joel		</title>
		<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2016/06/01/multichoice-doesnt-give-damn-censoring-lgbt-shows/#comment-998220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caulfield Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mambaonline.com/?p=64452#comment-998220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Multi-Choice has an obligation to South African viewers first.  If Nigerian viewers don&#039;t like what Multi-Choice has to offer then don&#039;t subscribe.  Our rights to open air satellite TV must not and should no be dictated to by another country -. i.e. Nigeria.  The Nigerian culture and beliefs should have no effect as to what we in SA are allowed and want to see.

&quot;I am Cait&quot; has been removed by Multi-Choice from the E-Entertainment channel due to complaints in Nigeria.  Why should this effect our viewing in SA - if they don&#039;t like what is shown on the E-Entertainment channel, then remove the channel from Nigeria.  We are subscribers as much as they are subscribers, but you would think Multi-Choice would consider the priorities of SA first.

The fact that Multi-Choice have stated the reason was due to complaints received by Nigeria should in itself been seen as the wrong approach to follow.  The law in SA is subject to the Constitution, and the Constitution categorically states in section 9(3) the state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth. Section 9(4) NO PERSON may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3)

The grounds for Multi-Choice refusal to screen &quot;I am Cait&quot; goes against section 9 of the Constitution of South Africa.  Again what another country which subscribes to Multi-Choice wants and does not not want to see has no legal bindings on what the viewers in SA can see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Multi-Choice has an obligation to South African viewers first.  If Nigerian viewers don&#8217;t like what Multi-Choice has to offer then don&#8217;t subscribe.  Our rights to open air satellite TV must not and should no be dictated to by another country -. i.e. Nigeria.  The Nigerian culture and beliefs should have no effect as to what we in SA are allowed and want to see.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am Cait&#8221; has been removed by Multi-Choice from the E-Entertainment channel due to complaints in Nigeria.  Why should this effect our viewing in SA &#8211; if they don&#8217;t like what is shown on the E-Entertainment channel, then remove the channel from Nigeria.  We are subscribers as much as they are subscribers, but you would think Multi-Choice would consider the priorities of SA first.</p>
<p>The fact that Multi-Choice have stated the reason was due to complaints received by Nigeria should in itself been seen as the wrong approach to follow.  The law in SA is subject to the Constitution, and the Constitution categorically states in section 9(3) the state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth. Section 9(4) NO PERSON may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3)</p>
<p>The grounds for Multi-Choice refusal to screen &#8220;I am Cait&#8221; goes against section 9 of the Constitution of South Africa.  Again what another country which subscribes to Multi-Choice wants and does not not want to see has no legal bindings on what the viewers in SA can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lara		</title>
		<link>https://www.mambaonline.com/2016/06/01/multichoice-doesnt-give-damn-censoring-lgbt-shows/#comment-998191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 05:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mambaonline.com/?p=64452#comment-998191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that LGBT people also have a voice. Why are Nigerians shut them out on a whole. Its unfair that SA shut them out too because of Nigeria. This is unjust and unfair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>I think that LGBT people also have a voice. Why are Nigerians shut them out on a whole. Its unfair that SA shut them out too because of Nigeria. This is unjust and unfair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
