…… I don’t think the press is being homophobic towards anyone. They are just going for the juicer story – whether it be true or not – to get more papers sold. I think the question is whether or not it was ethical that a 25 year old political aide was hired in the first place (meaning he was not suited for the job so why else was he hired but for the sex, so the newspapers claim) and he already had two advisors so why did he need a third? As I said, it’s just the press trying to seek out a story that isn’t there. If the man says nothing happened, then nothing happened. We should believe him until evidence to the contrary can be found.