NEW THEORY ON WHAT ‘MAKES PEOPLE GAY’
Scientists have come up with a new theory on what could contribute towards making people gay and why homosexuality has not disappeared due to evolution.
While it has been widely believed that homosexuality could, at least in part, be a genetic trait, the latest research suggests that it is indeed passed on by parents, but not through their genes.
According to American scientists, epigenetics – how gene expression is regulated by temporary switches, called epi-marks – appears to be a critical factor contributing to homosexuality.
Published on Tuesday in The Quarterly Review of Biology, the study claims that sex-specific epi-marks, which normally do not pass between generations and are usually “erased,” can lead to homosexuality when they escape erasure and are transmitted from father to daughter or mother to son.
From an evolutionary standpoint, homosexuality is a trait that would not be expected to develop and persist in the face of Darwinian natural selection, said the researchers. Homosexuality is nevertheless common for men and women in most cultures. Previous studies have shown that homosexuality runs in families, leading most researchers to presume a genetic underpinning of sexual preference.
However, no major gene for homosexuality has been found, despite numerous studies searching for a genetic connection.
In the current study, researchers from the Working Group on Intragenomic Conflict at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) in Tennessee have developed a model that outlines the role of epigenetics in homosexuality.
Epi-marks constitute an extra layer of information attached to our genes’ backbones that regulates their expression. While genes hold the instructions, epi-marks direct how those instructions are carried out – when, where and how much a gene is expressed during development.
Epi-marks are usually produced anew each generation, but recent evidence demonstrates that they sometimes carry over between generations, resembling the effect of shared genes.
Sex-specific epi-marks produced in early foetal development protect each sex from the substantial natural variation in testosterone that occurs during later foetal development. Sex-specific epi-marks stop girl foetuses from being masculinised when they experience higher than usual testosterone, and vice versa for boy foetuses.
Different epi-marks protect different sex-specific traits from being masculinised or feminised – some affect the genitals, others sexual identity, and yet others may affect sexual partner preference.
However, when these epi-marks are transmitted across generations from fathers to daughters or mothers to sons, they may cause reversed effects, such as the feminisation of some traits in sons, such as sexual preference, and similarly a partial masculinisation of daughters, said the scientists.
The study’s co-author Sergey Gavrilets, a professor at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, believes that the study solves the “evolutionary riddle of homosexuality” and that the “transmission of sexually antagonistic epi-marks between generations is the most plausible evolutionary mechanism of the phenomenon of human homosexuality”.
*phew* here I was lead to believe we were inspire by demonic forces!! What a relief it was broken down so simple. Believe it or not it explains why those phycos homo-conversion therapy ppl in the states tell thier victims to make effagies of thier mother n tell them to curse them. Perhaps on an instinctive level, those closeted sociopaths knew there mothers genes contributed to thier own homosexuality. Think about it.
This article needs to be published in a massive way- GLOBALLY!!!
Will the next step be to find a cure? How many of us would want a cure?
ROFL. I am more than my epi-marks. Isn’t this search for what makes you gay just a way to blame someone – nature, parents etc – it is almost a victim mentality. So what if you choose to like winkie or fanny. Big deal it’s 2012 build a bridge and get over it.
I don’t care what makes me gay – I’m proud of being gay and I don’t want to change anyway. This is just another scientist using us to try and get himself published. Watch out for a completely different article with a completely different theory from a new up and coming unpublished scientist in 3 months time. Next time it’ll probably be the preservatives in food we eat (fed to us probably by our parents).
Its a man thing the desire for sex is natural be it man to man or vice verse, the body, mind and soul, control it but scientists look for blaming their so called expertise on mother nature
Romans 1:24-32. Also it seems hopeless that one would have not choice over who they are. This study was far from conclusive and if you are looking for the answer in articles like this you are looking in the wrong place. Start in the truth of the word of God.